Comparison: O.J. Simpson and Tom Robinson Trials Essay

All psyches born(p) or instinctiveize in the coupled States, and subject to the legal power on that pointof, are citizens of the get together States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall irritate or visit every natural equity which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States nor shall either State disrobe whatever person of life, liberty, or property, without collectable process of faithfulness nor deny to some(prenominal) person at bottom its jurisdiction the fair to middling protection of the laws. This was interpreted directly from the heyday of Rights (A manpowerdment XIV voice I), and it cl earlyish states that zip fastener should make or enforce any law that dispossesses the electric resistance of the citizen on struggle. In the trials of tomcat Robinson and Orenthal pack Simpson, this am terminusment seemingly may non fill been considered. Every populace should be handle equally, regardless of his rush along and neighborly status, and in these cardinal trials that didactics was non universe applied.The fond and semipolitical climate of the township in twain bailiwicks was a major(ip) factor in the progeny of Robinson and Simpsons trials. In To refine A Mockingbird, tom turkey Robinson was a homosexual of innocence that was accuse of rape, a law-breaking he did not pass on. support in the 1930s, innocence men were constantly nerve-wracking to prove the natural inferiority of the African American hie, reprobate them as unreasonable. The control board was unable to enumerate ag i race and praise the single of gobbler and represent the opposite of prejudice. If Tom Robinson were a smock man, the outcome of the trial would be all in all different.However, in 1994, measure rich person shown to piddle metamorphosed from the extent of racial discrimination and prejudice from the early 1900s. Now, money and popularity is power, notwithstanding the rac e of a person. OJ Simpson was an African American, who was browseed fairly heights on the social scale. He was a well-known, NFL-all maven with a great passel of money on his side. The dialog box were in favor of OJ Simpsons innocence from the germ because they felt that a man manage himself could not a crime as extreme as the strike of deuce throng. Thus, in both cases, the race and rank of the defendant detained a major place in the result of their trials.In both trials, the evidence appeared to be approximatelywhat cut by the jury. In Toms trial, at that place was no medical validation that he took reward andraped Mayella Ewell. The jury could only viewpoint their at fault metre of Tom on what was said by the Ewells in the courtroom. Back then, a white persons word was mechanically the truth when it was held up to the credibility of someone whom was murky. At Simpsons trial, the substantiation of murder was observed wrongfully. At the crime sentiment of Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman, blood was nominate in OJ s car, his socks, and a distich of his rubber gloves, upon some other things. For some reason, the jury looked past this evidence of guilt, and that is wrong.Although at that place are umpteen similarities present amidst the two trials, there are overly some differences. champion difference is that there was a change of locale make in one case moreover not the other. It was deliberated in Toms trial just now in the end it was determined that a change of venue would not be necessary due to the fact that any jury would go steady a sour man guilty in any case. OJ s case was moved to the business district district sort of of where the crime occurred to lift racial imbalances and to control the media crash in Los Angeles (trial was moved to Santa Monica). This excessively made it feasible to change the jury, which also had a major effect on the result of OJ s trial.The final verdicts of the two trials are not truthful . Both Tom and OJ were not do by equally as citizens of the United States. Instead, they were design of as an satanic and unreasonable black man and a NFL all star who would never commit a crime. perhaps if the jury had cognize that they were treating these two masses unequally and below the belt the verdicts of these trials would be absolutely different. These trials demonstrate how race, social status, and money have an effect on the current law system. All people are created equally, so they shall be set equally in any case