The Chrysanthemums and A Jury of Her Peers Essay

The Chrysanthemums and A Jury of Her Peers - Essay Example This research will begin with the statement that in the world of literature, every author begins the creative process differently. Some start by creating a desired perception in their work by using unique and captivating settings to capture the attention of the audience. Through this choice of style, they can explore and show their audience the world in which they are going to place their characters. All of these approaches to writing are correct and accepted in writing, however; there are issues that must be observed to make any piece of literature to be considered a masterpiece in the field of writing. The setting of a story conveys characters and themes in a novel differently depending on the nature and type of the setting. These can be illustrated using these two novels chrysanthemums and A Jury of Her Peers. Close analysis of the chrysanthemums reveals that the story takes place in the Salinas Valley during the month of December at Henry Allen’s property located on the fo othill. Immediately we meet characters who depict a rural setting just in the preliminaries of the novel. The women are isolated in their own world and the men portray strength and are manlier than ordinary men are. Elisa’s husband rides on a range while Elisa herself is confined to her house and only works in her flower garden. The setting of the novel conditions her character and makes her behave rural like. Looking at the themes the rural setting of the story brings out the issue of oppression of women and freedom.

Downfall of Oedipus and Medea Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Downfall of Oedipus and Medea - Essay Example However, like all other tragedies this play also focuses on the downfall of Oedipus and interestingly enlightens the readers about power struggle between God and Man. Edith Hall also says, â€Å"Oedipus can only fulfill his exceptional god-ordained destiny because Oedipus is a preeminently capable and intelligent human being† (xvi). Although the ending of the play reiterates the fact that man is a puppet in the hands of fate and Gods. 2.1. Oedipus and his Intelligence The episode of Oedipus’s confrontation with the Sphinx is a testimony against his super intelligent brain. As Oedipus himself says, â€Å"When the Sphinx, that singing bitch, was here†¦ Her riddle was not something the first man to stroll along could solve—a prophet was required. But then I came, Oedipus, who knew nothing. Yet I finished her off, using my wits rather than relying on birds† (Sophocles lines 469-478). From this point onwards the readers observe that Oedipus starts consider ing himself super human and the readers start realizing that he is forgetting his status of a mere mortal. The Priest also tries to remind him of his status of a human being by saying, â€Å"you are not divine so confine within your human limitations† (Sophocles 54). In contrast to Oedipus’s intelligence, Sophocles presents the readers with Teiresias who behaves like a man of wisdom yet he fears Gods and knows his place although he also attained his level of wisdom after losing his physical sight. Hence, regardless of Oedipus’s over intelligence Teiresias realizes that he is the most ignorant of men. Teiresias voices his opinion by saying, â€Å"How dreadful it can be to have wisdom when it brings no benefit† (Sophocles 374-376). 2.2. Oedipus and his Pride Oedipus because of his intelligence begins to consider himself invincible, which can be equated to his arrogance or pride. This invincibility can be interpreted from his dialogues with Teiresias where h e repeatedly asserts his higher intellect as he also says at one point, â€Å"Mock my excellence, but you will find out I am truly great† (Sophocles 534-535). Sophocles strategically places Teiresias’s character in order to remind Oedipus of his follies though to no avail as he bluntly says to Oedipus, â€Å"That quality of yours now ruins you† (Sophocles 536). ‘That quality’ which Teiresias refers to can be perceived as both a reference to his over intelligence as well as his arrogance. 2.3. Oedipus and Fate Although it is observed that all the action that takes place in the play occurs according to the prophecies. Yet the readers cannot ignore the fact that the idea of fate or prophecy is an abstract idea. This conclusion can be drawn fro Teiresias’s comment that, â€Å"Yet events will still unfold, for all my silence. It is not your fate to fall because of me† (Sophocles 407-409). Teiresias here clearly declares that fate or prophec y has nothing to do with the Oedipus’s approaching suffering but it is Apollo is the actual cause of Oedipus’s suffering and pain. 2.4. Oedipus and Apollo The relation between the mortal and the God can be categorized as an apt explication of power struggle. Oedipus says, â€Å"When a man has no fear of doing the act, he’